Regular readers know of our little family blog that Michael Frontzeck hinterhergeweint on these pages is not a tear. It was the wrong man at the right place, and if it was up to us, he would never get a job in Gladbach. Unfortunately it was not for us, but after the birth register and the Lower Rhine Gladbacher National Register, which are after all comparatively original selection criteria which can be found elsewhere in this form only when similar parochial "F" C Kölle.
melt on the tongue, one must try, however, the hypocrisy and the Schleimscheißerei, with Eberl, Bonhof and Co now Harakiri continue their whitewash and pretend as if a firing is not a real being thrown out when the gunshot residue because of the smoking gun to be blurred, with some frosting.
"That we all have not wanted. Michael Frontzeck is always one of us", it can be quoted Rainer Bonhof, which could possibly apply for a name change soon in Rainer Hohn. Frontzeck was always apparent because one of us, as he used the same itch in his coaching career, as well as Borussia in recent years repeatedly put on the day. It is feared that so far he always remain a "we" is, as long as Eberl and Bonhof instead of soccer expertise exercise in Gladbach. It just does not have all the clubs former players as Hoeness in their own ranks, sorry Maxerl!
particularly distasteful, however, the sleazy attempt to do so, as it had been right to stick to Frontzeck like a hand on a hot stove. Will explain Max "Immanuel Kant" Eberl with philosophical depth. "We have this (the non-dismissal,
VfLog ) done in the winter of conviction and the first three games and the first half against Stuttgart have shown we are not wrong were. The trend over the last two games but then has meant that we react as "
It was not so wrong up to and including to the first half against Stuttgart. Then it came exactly 3 half-times, ie 135 minutes against Stuttgart and St. Pauli, on the basis of which we now had no choice, as to prejudice must Frontzeck. Listen to these people to actually? Either you assess the current season as a whole, then you come today, as before one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine and fifteen players to the conclusion that Frontzeck maybe a nice (if somewhat arrogant and narcissistic) guy is, but certainly not a coach of league format. Or, you continuity conjures up the death. But why then does after 135 minutes in which people like Frontzeck just as well as in all other games so far to find reasons why it could be, "satisfied" and "never lost anything," should give the coach and said even fall, people "not been wrong" have? Hello, anybody home?
how destructive such an illogical for each trust, all credibility is can it when you listen Bonhof vows to Max Eberl: "The question Max Eberl was never in the room he is and remains our sports director", affirmed Bonhof, but who should pay this man to the Frontzeck-U-turn or faith? And why Frontzeck in Bonhof eyes failed, Eberl not? Eberl, a man who really believes Sentences like this would make sense: "We were looking for a coach to continue our way a bit far but of course with the things that have gone wrong, attaches."
And what does Favre? "I want to stay abroad in one of the major leagues. And in a club that has ambitions and wants to win something." That was a year ago, at a press conference in which he settled accounts with the Hertha leadership. A club with ambition, he has found. In one of the big leagues, "Favre his new club but will probably have to run again until next year.
Voila! 
